EX PARTE PAUL EDWARD CARPENTER Applicant (original)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

span.WPParaBox { padding: 0px; width: 100%; margin: 0px; display: block } div.WPParaBoxWrapper { padding: 0px; float: left } p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }








IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,897




EX PARTE PAUL EDWARD CARPENTER Applicant




ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 02-7-19,537-A IN THE 24th DISTRICT COURT

FROM VICTORIA COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment in the aggravated sexual assault count and ten years’ imprisonment for each count of indecency with a child. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Carpenter v. State, No. 13-02-630-CR (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi, delivered February 17, 2005, pet. ref’d).

            Applicant contends, inter alia, that his conviction for indecency with a child by exposure in count three violates double jeopardy. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

            Based upon its review of the record, the trial court determined that Applicant’s conviction for indecency with a child by exposure was “incident to and subsumed by” the conviction for aggravated sexual assault as set out in count one, and is therefore in violation of the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy. Patterson v. State, 152 S.W.3d 88 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Applicant is entitled to relief.

            Relief is granted. As it relates to count three only, the judgment in Cause No. 02-7-19,537-A in the 24th Judicial District Court of Victoria County is set aside.

            Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Parole Division.

            All other relief requested is denied.

 

Delivered:       April 9, 2008

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.