EX PARTE CARLOS M. BUSH (original)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,825

EX PARTE CARLOS M. BUSH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 35053-B IN THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal for want of jurisdiction. Bush v. State, No. 06-07-00124-CR (Tex. App.-Texarkana, delivered July 31, 2007, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to appeal because appellate counsel was not timely appointed. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended that we grant Applicant an out-of-time appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 35053-B from the 124th Judicial District Court of Gregg County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Applicant's remaining claim is dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: January 23, 2008

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.