EX PARTE ROBERT TROY MCCLURE (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-68,968-01

EX PARTE ROBERT TROY MCCLURE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 04-0171-CR IN THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to six (6) years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he told counsel that he wanted a jury trial and that he wanted counsel to assert that he acted in self-defense. He alleges that his appointed counsel failed to show up on the day of trial and that a substitute counsel pleaded nolo contendere on his behalf even though he wanted to go to trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d) in that it shall order appointed counsel to file an affidavit in response to Applicant's allegations. If applicable, the trial judge shall also order substitute counsel to file an affidavit addressing Applicant's allegations. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his plea was involuntary. Specifically, the trial judge shall make findings as to whether Applicant told his appointed attorney and, if applicable, substitute counsel that he wanted to go to trial. The trial judge shall also make findings of fact as to whether counsel believed there was any basis to Applicant's assertions that he acted in self-defense. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.





Filed: January 16, 2008

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.