Mack v. Lott
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Demetrius Mack, Respondent, v. Leon Lott, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Richland County, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2014-002229 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Richland County DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27597 Heard November 17, 2015 – Filed December 9, 2015 DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Robert D. Garfield and Andrew F. Lindemann, both of Davidson & Lindemann, P.A., of Columbia, for Petitioner. Joshua Snow Kendrick and Christopher S. Leonard, both of Kendrick & Leonard, P.C., of Columbia, and Neal Michael Lourie, of Lourie Law Firm, L.L.C., of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Mack v. Lott, 410 S.C. 28, 762 S.E.2d 719 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted since both parties and the trial court agree that the proper standard for determining probable cause is an objective standard; that is, whether the facts known to the arresting officer at the time of the arrest, viewed from the standpoint of an objectively reasonable police officer, amount to probable cause. Because the Court of Appeals' language on this issue is arguably unclear, for the benefit of the bench and bar, we direct the Court of Appeals to depublish its opinion. Accordingly, we DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. PLEICONES, Acting Chief Justice, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
