State v. Newell

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Nicholas Shane Newell, Appellant. __________ Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge __________ Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-345 Submitted May 1, 2012 Filed June 6, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________ Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr. and J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Nicholas Shane Newell appeals his probation revocation, arguing his due process rights were violated as the arrest warrant does not indicate that he was provided a preliminary hearing upon his arrest. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1 APPEAL DISMISSED. PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.