In the Interest of Michael F

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Michael F.,

A Minor Under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County
F. P. Segars-Andrews, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-277
Submitted March 1, 2012 - File May 9, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Michael F. appeals the family court's order finding him in contempt for violating a previous family court order that ordered him to not receive any discipline referrals at school. On appeal, he argues the family court's contempt finding is erroneous because he did not receive notice of the written order prohibiting the discipline referrals. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.