State v. Boyce

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

William T. Boyce, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
 Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-611
Submitted December 1, 2009 Filed December 22, 2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: William T. Boyce appeals the revocation of his probation.  Boyce argues the circuit court erred as a matter of law, abused its discretion, and violated his right to due process of law by revoking his probation when he was not arrested for his probation violations until over two years after the probation arrest warrants were issued.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Boyce's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Boyce's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.