State v. Goss

this Opinion Has No Precedential Value. It Should not be cited or relied on as precedent in any proceeding except as provided by rule 268(d)(2), scacr.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jamie Goss a/k/a James Gause, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-610
Submitted December 1, 2009 Filed December 22, 2009

Appeal Dismissed

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jamie Goss appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in crack cocaine.  Goss asserts the trial court erred in admitting testimony in violation of Rule 1002, SCRE, and in denying his motion for a new trial based on evidence discovered after trial.   After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Goss's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.