State v. Neely

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Anterrance S. Neely, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-555
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Anterrance Neely appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred by revoking his probation rather than ordering out-patient drug treatment and continued community supervision.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., Huff, and Geathers, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.