In the Interest of Dustin D

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Dustin D., A minor under the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County
Leslie K. Riddle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-546
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed November 20, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Larry L. Vanderbilt, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dustin D. appeals his probation revocation and resulting commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period of time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday.  Dustin D. argues the probation revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for review.    After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.