The State v. Clord Harrell

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clord Harrell, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County
Kristi Lee Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-531
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Clord Harrell appeals his guilty plea to criminal domestic violence.  On appeal, Harrell argues his guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Harrell's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Harrell's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.