State v. Glover

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Martin Glover, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-442
Submitted September 1, 2009 Filed October 1, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Alpin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Martin Glover appeals the revocation of his probation.  Glover argues the probation revocation hearing is too summary for appellate review.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Glover's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.