State v. Earle

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sharrica Q. Earle, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2009-UP-441
Submitted September 1, 2009 Filed October 1, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sharrica Q. Earle appeals her probation revocation, arguing the trial court abused its discretion in revoking her probation because the revocation prevented her from working and continuing to pay her restitution.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Short, Williams, and Geathers, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.