State v. Sager

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent.

v.

Keith Justin Sager, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-409
Submitted September 1, 2009 Filed September 2, 2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Justin Sager appeals his conviction for eavesdropping or peeping tom, arguing the trial court erred by refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.