State v. Wingate
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In
The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lavada E. Wingate, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-703
Submitted December 1, 2008 Filed
December 15, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Teresa A Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lavada Wingate appeals from the revocation of her probation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking her probation without holding a full evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.