State v. Gilmore

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clifton Deon Gilmore, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-700
Submitted December 1, 2008 Filed December 15, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Clifton Deon Gilmore appeals his probation revocation and the suspension of his sentence in full.  Gilmore argues the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his suspended sentence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.