State v. Wilson
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Joseph Wilson, Appellant.
Appeal From Williamsburg County
Paula H. Thomas, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-641
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed
November 17, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Patrick James McLaughlin, of Florence, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joseph Wilson appeals his convictions for murder, criminal conspiracy, attempted armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent crime. Wilson argues the trial court erred in: failing to charge the jury on accessory to murder; failing to charge the jury on manslaughter; allowing the state to proceed with both the charge of armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent crime; and granting the state's motion to amend the date on the indictments. After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Wilson's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.