State v. Ware

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Ware, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County
 J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-615
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed November 10, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and  Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jeffery Ware appeals his convictions and sentence for one count of stalking and two counts of harassment.  Ware claims the court erred in allowing a hearsay statement into evidence made by Ware's father to the victim.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Ware's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.