State v. Bradley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stanley Bradley, Appellant.

Appeal From Calhoun County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-613
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed November 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia, and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Stanley Bradley was found guilty of first degree burglary and criminal sexual conduct in the first degree and sentenced to concurrent sentences of thirty-five and thirty years, respectively.  Bradley appeals his convictions, arguing the trial court erred by admitting testimony referencing Bradley's drug use.  Bradley filed a pro se brief contending his second trial violated his constitutional rights by exposing him to double jeopardy.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Bradley's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.