State v. Spencer
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Earl Spencer, Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-589
Submitted October 1, 2008 Filed October
15, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: A jury found Earl Spencer guilty of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Spencer argues the trial judge erred in refusing to grant his motion for directed verdict. He also filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Spencer's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.