State v. Shumate

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Avis Shumate, Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County
 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-505
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed September 5, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Avis Shumate appeals her probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking her probation because insufficient evidence supported finding she violated the conditions of her probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Shumate's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.