State v. Buckle
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Evelyn Buckle, Appellant.
Appeal from Richland County
Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-496
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed
September 4, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Robert M. Dudek, Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of the Columbia; and Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Evelyn Buckle was convicted of murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, Buckle's counsel argues the judge erred by admitting statements Appellant made after a polygraph examination. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.