State v. Wilson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Arthur Billy Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County
 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-469
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August 8, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia, and Solicitor I. McDuffie  Stone, III, of Beaufort, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Arthur Billy Wilson appeals a restitution order requiring him to pay $6,919.03.  Wilson argues the court erred in allowing a document into evidence which the State failed to disclose pursuant to Rule 5, SCRCrimP.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.