State v. Klein

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

William Charles Klein, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-369
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 11, 2008     

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  William Charles Klein appeals the revocation of his probation.  He argues the trial court erred in allowing his ex-wife to testify regarding matters unrelated to his probation revocation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Klein's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.   

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J, concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.