State v. McClintock

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marcus McClintock, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County
 Gordon G. Cooper, Master In Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-094
Submitted February 1, 2008 Filed February 11, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel, John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Marcus McClintock appeals the revocation of his suspended sentence, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his suspended sentence because there was insufficient evidence to support a finding he violated the terms of his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] McClintock's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.