State v. Gilliard
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Matthew William Gilliard, III, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-044
Submitted January 2, 2008 Filed January
14, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, , all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Matthew W. Gilliard, III, appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the probation judge erred in revoking his probation because he did not willfully fail to pay his supervision fees. Gilliard did not file a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Gilliard's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.