State v. Washington
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Washington, Appellant.
Appeal from Richland County
Reginald I. Lloyd,
Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-012
Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January 9, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kenneth Washington appeals the revocation of his probation. Washington contends the circuit court committed an abuse of discretion in revoking his probation without a showing of a willful and intentional violation. After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Washington's pro se response brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Washington's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
ANDERSON, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.