State v. Carpenter
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Deonta Carpenter, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-166
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 12, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia; and Deonta Carpenter, of Bishopville, for Appellant.
Teresa A Knox, S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Deonta Carpenter appeals the revocation of his probation. His counsel contends the court erred in failing to find his violations were willful prior to revoking his probation. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Carpenter's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, BEATTY, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.