State v. Jordan
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(1), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jermaine Jordan, Appellant.
Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-406
Submitted June 1, 2005 Filed June 24, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jermaine Jordan appeals from his conviction of first-degree burglary, arguing the trial judge erred by failing to direct a verdict because the State did not produce any evidence of Jordan's intent to commit a crime in the dwelling. Jordan's counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and BEATTY and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.