Krivitsky v. Krivitsky
Annotate this CaseDefendant Brian Krivitsky appealed pro se from two family court orders authorizing a commissioner to sell Defendant's real property to satisfy the child-support arrearage he owed to Plaintiff, Jo-An Krivitsky. The Supreme Court affirmed the orders of the family court, holding (1) the family court had jurisdiction to enter the appealed orders; (2) under the circumstances of this case, the family court did not abuse its discretion by appointing a commissioner to facilitate the marketing and sale of Defendant's property at a reasonable price; and (3) the hearing justice maintained the requisite judicial impartiality and Defendant's assertions that the hearing justice showed a bias toward Plaintiff and her counsel were without merit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.