In the Matter of: er Francis Blust (disciplinary order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of PETER FRANCIS BLUST : : : : : : : : : : No. 3011 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 146 DB 2023 (Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, No. CP-09-CR-0002238-2022) Attorney Registration No. 47072 (Philadelphia) ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2023, having received no response to a rule to show cause why Respondent Peter Francis Blust should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and Respondent is placed on temporary suspension. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(2). Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent’s right to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to request accelerated disposition of any charges underlying this Order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(4) and (f)(2) are specifically preserved. This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(2) (providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Rule 402 when “the investigation is predicated upon a conviction of the respondent-attorney for a crime”).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.