Commonwealth v. Rodland, C. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CHRISTOPHER M. RODLAND, Petitioner : No. 86 WM 2017 : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Review of Stay Order from the Superior Court and the Petition to Immediately Stay/Vacate Superior Court Order are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.