Washington, S. v. Hamilton, H. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT HARRY EDWIN STANLEY HAMILTON, Petitioner v. SHERRILYN D. WASHINGTON, Respondent SHERRILYN DENISE WASHINGTON, Respondent v. HARRY EDWIN HAMILTON, Petitioner : No. 74 MM 2016 : : : : : : : : : No. 75 MM 2016 : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2016, the Application to Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED. Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.