Lancaster Co v. PA Labor Rel Board of: AFSCME - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : No. 56 MAL 2014 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the v. : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS : BOARD : : : AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES : DISTRICT COUNCIL 89, : : Intervenor : : : PETITION OF: AMERICAN : FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND : MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT : COUNCIL 89, : LANCASTER COUNTY Intervenor ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are: 1. Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the [PLRB s] final order determining that the County of Lancaster discharged Adam Medina and Tommy Epps in violation of the Public Employe Relations Act, where the court exceeded the limited standard of review? 2. Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the Board s order affirming the hearing examiner s finding of an independent violation of Section 1201(a)(1) of the Public Employe Relations Act, without remand to the board?

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.