Wilenzik v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT MARVIN L. WILENZIK, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent : No. 55 MM 2014 : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2014, the Application for Extraordinary Relief and the Application to Seal Exhibit 8 of the April 10, 2014 Application for Extraordinary Relief are GRANTED. Mr. Justice Saylor respectfully dissents, save with regard to the application to seal. See Pa.R.D.E. 211(a) ( Processing of complaints involving material allegations which are substantially similar to the material allegations of pending criminal or civil litigation shall not be deferred unless the Board in its discretion, for good cause shown, authorizes such deferment. ).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.