Glick, R. v. Progressive Northern Ins. Co. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT DR. RICHARD S. GLICK, D.O., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY AND MOUNTAIN LAUREL INS., CO., D/B/A PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., Respondents DR. RICHARD S. GLICK, D.O., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY AND MOUNTAIN LAUREL INS., CO., D/B/A PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., Respondents : No. 240 EAL 2014 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 241 EAL 2014 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED and Respondent s Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is DISMISSED as moot. [240 EAL 2014 and 241 EAL 2014] - 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
