Reisinger v. Luzerne Co, et al / of: Cadle Co. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : No. 22 MM 2014 : : v. : : : LUZERNE COUNTY; LUZERNE : COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU; MARY : K. DYSLESKI: STEPHEN A. URBAN; : MARYANNE C. PETRILLA; GREGORY : SKREPENAK; SAMUEL GUESTO; : SAMUEL DIAZ; NEIL T. O'DONNELL; : JAMES P. BLAUM; THE CADLE : COMPANY II, INC.; DANIEL C. CADLE; : MICHAEL KERMEC; DOUG HARRAH; : KEVIN T. FOGERTY; TINA RANDAZZO; : NOVA SAVINGS BANK; AND CRAIG J. : SCHER : : PETITION OF: THE CADLE COMPANY : II, INC. : : JOSEPH R. REISINGER ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2014, the Application for Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Leave to File Response Nunc Pro Tunc are DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.