Miller & 126 Hotel Corp s v. SEPTA - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DAVID MILLER AND I26 HOTEL CORPORATION, Petitioners v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent : No. 236 MAL 2013 : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 31st day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, as stated by petitioners: Did the Commonwealth Court s decision conflict with decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court where it affirmed the lower court s order granting [respondent] SEPTA s Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that Congress intended to preempt state law claims of negligent railroad bridge construction and interference with riparian rights when it enacted the Federal Railroad Safety Act? Petitioner's Application for Leave to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.