Haagensen v. Reed et al; (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JANICE S. HAAGENSEN, PLAINTIFF PRO SE AND PERSONAL REPRENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MYRTLE S. HAAGENSEN, Petitioner v. BETTY M. REED AND EDWARD ABERSOLD, AND RUFUS J. HERSHBERGER AND ANNIE K. HERSHBERGER, Respondents : No. 451 WAL 2011 : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.