Cruz, J. v. Princeton Ins. Co., et al. (Summary Disposition)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JACQUELINE NIEVES CRUZ AND OSCAR CRUZ, Petitioners v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, ALAN S. GOLD, ESQUIRE AND GOLD, BUTKOVITZ AND ROBINS, PC, Respondents : No. 364-365 EAL 2007 : : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 29th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court s decision is REVERSED in part to the extent it holds that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the use of the process was primarily used for a purpose for which it was not designed. See Wimer v. Pa. Emp. Benefit Trust Fund, 939 A.2d 843 (Pa. 2007); see also McNeil v. Jordan, 894 A.2d 1260(Pa. 2006). Further, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of the harm element of McNeil, 894 A.2d at 1275. Madame Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.