Satterfield, P. v. Pa. Dept. of Corrections (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT PAUL SATTERFIELD, AND ALL OTHER INMATES SIMILARLY SITUATED WITHIN THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, : No. 23 EAP 2007 : : : : : Appellants : : : v. : : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS; JEFFREY A. BEARD, : Ph.D.; SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; : WILLIAM S. STICKMAN, DEPUTY : SECRETARY FOR WESTERN REGION; : MICHAEL A FAMAN, CHIEF COUNSEL; : TIMOTHY I. MARK, DEPUTY CHIEF : COUNSEL; ROBERT S. BITNER, CHIEF : HEARING EXAMINER; HARRY E. : WILSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI- : FAYETTE; KERRI CROSS, HEARING : EXAMINER; CARL E. WALKER, : PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE; : BRADLEY NEWTON, PROGRAM : REVIEW COMMITTEE; ROBERT : STAFFORD, PROGRAM REVIEW : COMMITTEE; DEBRA MAHIMEISTER, : CORRECTIONS CLASSIFICATION AND : PROGRAM MANAGER; MICHAEL : HOWARD, INMATE EMPLOYMENT : OFFICER, : : Appellees : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the above-captioned appeal is herewith quashed for failure to file a brief.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.