Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing, et al. (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[J-123-2006] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT H. RYAN HUTCHINSON, Appellant v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY AND PENSKE CORPORATION, KEYSTONE FOODS NORH AMERICA, FREIGHTLINER, LLC AND MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, Appellees H. RYAN HUTCHINSON, Appellant v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY AND PENSKE CORPORATION AND FREIGHTLINER, LLC, Appellees : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 10 EAP 2006 Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on 5/17/05 at No. 463 EDA 2004 (reargument denied on 7/21/05) remanding for a new trial the order entered on 2/9/04 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 3460 February Term 2001 No. 11 EAP 2006 Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on 5/17/05 at No. 497 EDA 2004 (reargument denied on 7/21/05) remanding for a new trial the order entered on 2/9/04 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 3460 February Term 2001 ARGUED: October 16, 2006 ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2007, the order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. Former Justice Newman did not participate in the decision of this case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.