Boro Developers, Inc., et al , Pets v. Bonovitacola Electric Coontractor, et al (Summary Disposition)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BORO DEVELOPERS, INC., BRUCE H. SHAPIRO AND FREDERICK J. SHAPIRO, : : : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : BONOVITACOLA ELECTRIC : CONTRACTOR, INC., LOCAL UNION : NO. 654 INTERNATIONAL : BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL : WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 98 : INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF : ELECTRICAL WORKERS, STEVEN F. : MARINO, ESQUIRE, DAVID H. CONROY, : ESQUIRE AND MARINO & : ASSOCIATES, : : Respondents : No. 161 MAL 2007 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the memorandum opinion and order of the Superior Court at No. 1831 EDA 2005, dated November 30, 2006, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County at 03-03833, dated June 8, 2005. ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 17, 2007 The Petition of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. It is also ordered that this case be REMANDED to the Superior Court to remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to VACATE its order, sustaining the preliminary objections filed by Local Union No. 654 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and transferring the action to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Pa.R.C.P. No. 1006(c)(1),(e); Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc., 909 A.2d 1272, 1281 (Pa. 2006). Mr. Justice Saylor would allow the appeal and address the matter by written opinion after briefing and argument.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.