In re: Nomination Petition of Deyoung, Appeal of Riley, IV (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[J-96-2006] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF MARIE DEYOUNG AS A DEMOCRAT FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE 163RD LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT APPEAL OF: HARRY M. RILEY, IV : No. 55 MAP 2006 : : : Appeal from the Order entered in the : Commonwealth Court on April 7, 2006 : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2006, we REVERSE the Order of the Commonwealth Court and REMAND to the Commonwealth Court for a decision on the merits on Appellee Harry M. Riley s Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition. Said decision to be rendered within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. A qualified private party has a right to object to a Statement of Financial Interests attached to a Nomination Petition, therefore Appellee has standing to object in this matter. Cf. In re Nomination Petition Bryant, 578 Pa. 421, 852 A.2d 1193 (2004); In re Petition of Cioppa, 533 Pa. 564, 626 A.2d 146 (1993). Opinion to follow. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.