Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex rel Gerald Pappert, Attorney General v. Coy (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL. GERALD J. PAPPERT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v. JEFFREY W. COY, Appellee : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 171 MAP 2004 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on 9/24/04 (exited 9/27/04) at No. 640 MD 2004 ORDER PER CURIAM: Decided: October 15, 2004 AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 847 A.2d 55 (Pa. 2004). Appellant s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.