Comm. v. Grant, Aplt (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT J-9-2002 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 57 WAP 2001 : Appellee : : Application for Reargument : v. : : : TAIBU MODAMU GRANT A/K/A BRYANT : DAMU TAIBU A/K/A/ TYRONE GRAMM, : : Appellant : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2003, the Application for Reargument is DENIED. We clarify that the rule announced in Commonwealth v. Grant, 813 A.2d 726 (Pa. 2002), does not apply to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel where the intermediate appellate court on direct appeal has rendered a disposition on the merits.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.