Comm v. Mack, Pet (Summary Disposition)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 600 WAL 2002 : Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : order of the Superior Court : v. : : : SHERMAN MACK, : : Petitioner : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED in part, but LIMITED to the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a motion to suppress the evidence found in the second search of Michelle Wilkinson's vehicle and in failing to object to that evidence being introduced into evidence. See "Statement Pursuant to Rule 1925(b) of Appellate Procedure," p. 3, para. 2a. The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration and determination of this issue. In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.