In Re: Petition to Set Aside the Nom. Pet. of J. O'Hara ~ E. Sichler (Single Judge Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition to Set Aside The Nomination Petition of Joseph J. O'Hara Elizabeth A. Sichler, Petitioner : : : : : : : No. 141 M.D. 2002 Heard: March 27, 2002 BEFORE: HONORABLE ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON FILED: April 5, 2002 Before the Court is a petition filed by Elizabeth A. Sichler to set aside the nomination petition of Joseph J. O Hara as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election for the 117th District of the Pennsylvania General Assembly. Although Sichler challenged O Hara s nomination petitions on numerous grounds, at the hearing before this Court on March 27, 2002, Sichler and O Hara agreed that the issue raised by Sichler in paragraph 5 of her petition was dispositive and that this was the only issue upon which the Court need rule. In paragraph 5 of the petition, Sichler alleged that the nomination petitions circulated by Joseph F. O Hara 1 failed to conform with Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Election Code (Code), Act of June 3, 1937, P.L. 1333, as amended, 25 P.S. §2868, because the circulator was not a registered member of the Republican Party at the time the petitions were circulated. A review of the two nomination petitions circulated by Joseph F. O Hara indicates that electors signed the petitions between February 25, 2002 and March 4, 2002. 1 Joseph F. O Hara is apparently the father of respondent Joseph J. O Hara. Sichler subpoenaed Kevin J. Jordan, Director of the Department of Voter Services for the Luzerne County Board of Elections (Board). Jordan testified regarding the voter registration process in Luzerne County. We admitted without objection copies of voter registration applications kept by Jordan as the record custodian for the Board. Included in the copies was the voter registration application of Joseph F. O Hara mailed to the Board. In block 8 of the application, O Hara indicated that he wished to be registered as a member of the Republican Party. The application evidences a postmark of February 25, 2002 and a date received stamp by the Board of February 26, 2002. Because Section 909 of the Pennsylvania Election Code, as amended, 25 P.S. §2869, requires that members of the party circulate petitions for party nominations, we must determine the date Joseph F. O Hara became a member of the Republican Party. The Pennsylvania Election Code and related laws, however, do not specify the time at which an elector is qualified to circulate a nominating petition. We bear in mind that the Pennsylvania Election Code must be liberally construed so as not to deprive an individual of his or her right to run for office or the voters of their right to elect the candidate of choice. In re Nomination Petitions of McIntyre, 778 A.2d 746 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001). We seek guidance from the Pennsylvania Voter Registration Act (PVRA), Act of June 30, 1995, P.L. 170, 25 P.S.§§961.101 961.5109, enacted to ensure compliance with changes in voter registration procedures following the implementation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), P.L. 103-21, 42 U.S.C. §§1973gg-1 1973gg10. The NVRA, commonly referred to as the Motor-Voter Law, provided for varying methods of registration, including among others, registration at the time an 2 individual applies for a driver s license. The PVRA therefore has different procedures to be followed by local election boards or commissions depending upon the method the individual uses for registration. Section 524 of the PVRA, 25 P.S. §961.524, provides for application by mail. Section 526 of the PVRA, titled Time, 25 P.S. §961.526, provides for the administration of voter registration and a determination of eligibility of an applicant to vote in an election. Section 526(b), titled Deadlines, requires each registration commission ensure that any eligible applicant is registered to vote in an election when the applicant has met any of the following conditions. 25 P.S. §961.526(b). Subsection (b)(2) determines the deadline when one registers to vote by mail. It provides: In the case of registration by mail under section 524, if the valid voter registration mail application is postmarked not later than the deadline to register for the ensuing election or, in the case of an illegible or missing postmark, it is received not later than five days after the deadline to register for the ensuing election. (Emphasis added). 25 P.S. §961.526(b)(emphasis added). In the case of registration by mail, the local election Board is to look at the postmark date for determination of eligibility to vote in an election. We acknowledge that Section 528 of PVRA, titled Approval of registration applications, provides procedures for verifying the accuracy of a voter s registration application. 25 P.S. §961.528. Section 528 is the process by which the statutory registration approval is finalized. After processing, a mailed application may be rejected for various reasons. 3 Upon approval, however, eligibility to vote is established not by the acceptance date but by the postmark on the application and relates back to that time. 2 By analogy, we hold that upon approval an application to register as a member of a political party relates back to the postmark on the mailed application. The postmark date of the application mailed to the Board by Joseph F. O Hara is February 25, 2002. Upon approval, his status as a member of the Republican Party relates back to that date. The nomination petitions circulated by him do not contain any signature dated before February 25, 2002. As a result we find no merit in the objections set forth in paragraph 5 of the petition. In accordance with the stipulation of the parties for disposition of the petition, the petition is denied and dismissed. ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge 2 Section 528(d) provides for the transmission and content of an elector s voter identification card. Subsection (d)(3) states, among other things, that [n]o registration application shall be deemed to be accepted until ten days after the voter s identification card has been mailed. 25 P.S.§961.528(d)(3). 4 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition to Set Aside The Nomination Petition of Joseph J. O'Hara Elizabeth A. Sichler, Petitioner : : : : : : : No. 141 M.D. 2002 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2002, the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Joseph J. O Hara is denied and dismissed. shall bear his or her own costs. ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge Each party
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
