Chapman v. Dept. of Rev.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax ALLYSEN CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 180336G FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1 This case is subject to dismissal after Plaintiff failed to respond to the court’s show-cause order. Pursuant to Tax Court Rule – Magistrate Division 21, the court dismisses appeals where a plaintiff fails to appear for a scheduled proceeding. Plaintiff did not appear at the telephone case management conference set for 2:45 p.m. on November 5, 2018. On November 6, 2018, the court sent Plaintiff a letter ordering her to explain in writing why this case should not be dismissed. That letter warned that Plaintiff’s case would be dismissed if her response was not received by November 20, 2017. The court did not receive a written response from Plaintiff. Now, therefore, /// /// /// /// This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered November 27, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). 1 FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 180336G 1 of 2 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed. Dated this day of December, 2017. POUL F. LUNDGREN MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was signed by Magistrate Poul F. Lundgren and entered on December 13, 2018. FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 180336G 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.