Antonov v. Dept. of Revenue
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax NIKOLAY ANTONOV and ANNA ANTONOV (BURLACHKO), Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 160365R FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1 This matter came before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. A case management conference was scheduled at 9:30 a.m. on January 27, 2017, to consider Plaintiffs’ appeal. On January 12, 2017, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiffs at the email address Plaintiffs provided to the court. The court’s notice was not returned as undeliverable. That notice advised that if Plaintiffs did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal. Plaintiffs failed to appear for the scheduled case management conference. On January 30, 2017, the court sent Plaintiffs a letter that explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The court’s letter advised that if Plaintiffs did not provide a written explanation by February 13, 2017, for their failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. On February 13, 2017, the court received a letter from Plaintiffs explaining the reasons for their non-appearance for the conference. Also on February 13, 2017, 1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered March 22, 2017. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 160365R 1 the court received a call from Mr. Antonov about missing the conference. Court notes indicate that Mr. Antonov advised the court that the email address used by the court was correct and that Plaintiffs wanted to continue receiving court notices by email. On February 24, 2017, the court sent an email notice of a second case management conference scheduled for March 16, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. The court’s notice was not returned as undeliverable. That notice advised that if Plaintiffs did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal. Plaintiffs did not appear for the second conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiffs’ appeal is dismissed. Dated this day of April 2017. RICHARD DAVIS MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was filed and entered on April 11, 2017. DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 160365R 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
